|
The IPPNW Program
Director casts light on the NPT
What is NPT?
The Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which came into force in 1970, has been
the
single most important measure the world has taken to date to prevent
the global
spread of nuclear weapons and to lay the foundation for their
elimination. At
the heart of the NPT is a three-part bargain: in exchange for a promise
by the
non-nuclear weapon states to foreswear the acquisition of nuclear
weapons
(Article II), the nuclear weapon states (NWS) at the Treaty's inception
(the
US, the Soviet Union, the UK, France, and China) made a commitment to
nuclear
disarmament (Article VI); as a further incentive, those states wishing
to use
nuclear energy for “peaceful purposes” would receive technical
assistance
(Article IV). There are 189 NPT member states, although the
decision by
North Korea (DPRK) to withdraw from the treaty, which has not been
formally
accepted, would reduce the number to 188.
Why is it important?
The NPT has
been largely successful in curtailing the spread of nuclear weapons
around the
world, and lays the foundation for the complete elimination of nuclear
weapons.
Without the NPT, it is likely that many more countries would now have
nuclear
arsenals of their own, and even more would have nuclear weapons
development
programs that could produce warheads in a short time.
What roles did IPPNW play
in the recent NPT
review conference?
IPPNW sent a
delegation of more than 20 physicians, medical students, and staff from
at least
9 countries to the Review, where they took part in the May 1
demonstration in Central Park,
several NGO panels on disarmament and
non-proliferation topics, and formal and informal meetings with member
state
delegations and embassies. IPPNW medical students presented a panel on
disarmament education using the Nuclear Weapons Inheritance Project as
a model,
and organized several "Target X" events in Times
Square, where they educated pedestrians about the medical
consequences of nuclear war and the importance of the NPT.
IPPNW worked
closely with the NGO community and with representatives of civil
society --
particularly the Abolition 2000 network, Mayors For Peace, indigenous
communities, youth groups, and hibakusha (atomic
bomb survivors) -- to write and coordinate a series of presentations,
including
civil society recommendations on implementing commitments to
disarmament and
non-proliferation goals. These presentations were made during a formal
NGO
session of the Review on May 11. IPPNW also helped coordinate two NGO
press
conferences that were held during the Review to draw attention to the
voices of
civil society.
What
was the outcome of the conference?
Despite tireless
efforts at diplomacy, the
2005 Review was declared a failure by the conference president, Sergio
Duarte
of Brazil,
and by most of the member states who offered concluding statements. The
final
document was nothing more than a procedural report of the meeting,
listing
participants, the meetings held, how financial costs would be covered,
and
other technical matters. On the other hand, many useful proposals were
submitted to the Conference on ways to enhance the Treaty and the
contributions
to the Review by NGOs and other representatives of civil society cannot
be
overestimated. More than 1,750 NGO delegates were registered with the
UN at the
start of the Conference. The May Day demonstration drew an estimated
40,000
people and attracted substantial media coverage, and the symbolic
presence of hibakusha – was very strong. The mayors
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki provided a clear vision
for the
elimination of nuclear weapons by 2020 in their presentations on behalf
of
Mayors for Peace. The single most important lesson of this Review is
that NGOs,
as representatives of global civil society, must help to create the
political
will that states need to complete the task of creating a
nuclear-weapons-free
world.
John Loretz
IPPNW Program Director
|